I have hacked with the current framework while ago. I almost know how things
work. (Dave has been a great help for my questions...).
My plan is to transfer the things I have created with drupal to the current
framework also :)
I was also thinking of letting everything in the site's database. Why would
we want to export things and then re-import them back in the CVS? But then
again this is just my opinion. The decisions are on the masters :)
Gevik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha@sollentuna.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:32 PM
> To: Dave Page; Gevik babakhani; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] PGDN and CVS
>
> > 1. Do we want to put the static PGDN files in CVS
> > anyway? Should we keep the PGDN files separate not mixing
> > with the current site's CVS?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, we do want them in CVS because we build the entire from
> > there & the backend database. we don't want to start pulling
> > in content from additional places as that just makes it much
> > harder to rebuild the servers if there is ever a problem.
>
> While I agree with you in general, here's a point I'd liek to add. :-)
>
> Gevik, if I get your latest blog post right, you are back to a custom
> CMS and not using Drupal? Then, IMHO, another option is if you can build
> the site completely with PHP code on our site framework and store all
> the data in the site database. In this case I see no more reason to
> store the static pages for this one than there is for the docs or other
> parts of the site. But this assumes that *all* the code required to
> maintain the site is in our framework, and we're not relying on an
> outside CMS.
>
> //Magnus
