Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20050825231318.GD23250@surnet.cl Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion ("J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>) Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, on May 17, 2004, you wrote: > So, yea, I am frustrated. I know these features are hard and complex, > but I want them for PostgreSQL, and I want them as soon as possible. I > guess what really bugs me is that we are so close to having these few > remaining big features, and because they are so complex, they are taking > a lot longer to arrive than previous features, and sometimes see a year > pass without progress on some items, and that bugs me. This discussion was taking place as we closed the 7.5 development cycle, and we weren't getting PITR, tablespaces, nested transactions, 2PC, the Win32 port, in the release. We have all those things now. We have gone a long way now, even though it was only a year ago. My question for everyone on this list is: What are the "few remaining big features" that you see missing for PostgreSQL? Or, slightly different, what are people's most wanted features? Has PostgreSQL started slowing down in getting new features, and concentrating mostly on performance issues? -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) A male gynecologist is like an auto mechanic who never owned a car. (Carrie Snow)
pgsql-hackers by date: