Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date
Msg-id 20050811185418.GB24670@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:26:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Interesting.  I wonder why the function is not defined instead with OUT
> > parameters.  That way you don't have to declare the record at execution
> > time.  See my patch to pgstattuple for an example.
>
> Uh, where is that patch?  I can't find it.

Hmm, seems it never made it to the list, I can't find it in the
archives either.  Here it is.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"¿Qué importan los años?  Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo"  (Mafalda)

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch