I think we agreed on pg_postmaster_start_time() so it is clear it is the
postmaster, and not the session.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> > I think we should return intervals only when we can't return
> > meaningful
> > timestamp values. I don't have any logic to back up that opinion,
> > though.
> >
> Agreed.
>
> >
> > We need to preceed our function names with pg_ for cases like this
> > where
> > we are supplying pg-specific behavior.
> >
> Agreed.
>
> An updated version of the patch is attached. It is just implement
> 'pg_start_time' function that works in multi-user and stand-alone. Docs
> is attached too.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> euler[at]yahoo_com_br
>
> __________________________________________________
> Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
> http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/
Content-Description: 958887538-uptime6.diff
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
