Re: psql backslash consistency - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: psql backslash consistency
Date
Msg-id 200505281251.23879.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql backslash consistency  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> > third or fourth go around on this?  It seems rather unfair to put this
> > burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
>
> The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
> the idea is not uncontroversial.  I think it's necessary to look for a
> compromise that everyone can live with.  You're really wasting your
> breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
> anyone's mind will change.
>

I haven't heard a new objection yet that was discussed the previous several go
arounds, and yet here we are adding yet another precondition...

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: hash index work
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patches for items from TODO list