On Monday 16 May 2005 14:12, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:50, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > The only way in my mind to get this dynamism on the website is to make
> > the website part of the process at some level. If someone has to go
> One idea I've tossed around is requiring patches to include release
> notes, and then display the release notes on the web site as a "done so
> far" type of list. It doesn't get you what is under active development,
> but would get you a more up-to-date picture of changes as a release
> evolves.
Well, there is always the '-committers' list; if all CVS commits had/have
meaningful commit changelog notices, then that could drive something.
There are two things being talked about here:
1.) A forward-looking rad map;
2.) A status indication of where development is happening, and a history of
past development.
In my mind 2 is more important than 1, for all the reasons Tom already
mentioned.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
