Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 200505051558.55390.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:25, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Can I suggest that we focus on PLs first and foremost, since that will
> >> allow us to get stuff like pl/PHP, pl/Java, pl/J(?), and pl/R in place,
> >> and then ramp up other stuff as time permits?
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> 'k, if there are no disagreements ...

A big reason I wanted plphp in the main souce was because I wanted it to be 
part of the core package to help ease installation to be just one download 
and one run at configure.  I have marvel at the irony that not only is this 
not going to happen, I will actually now have to download additional packages 
for things I used to get in the core package.  

I guess this is progress, but I foresee a lot of "what version of plfoo did 
you try to install against your database" posts coming into the lists.   

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement