Re: does database shut down cleanly when WAL device fails? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: does database shut down cleanly when WAL device fails?
Date
Msg-id 200505050241.j452fYu05872@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: does database shut down cleanly when WAL device fails?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Brandon Craig Rhodes <brandon@rhodesmill.org> writes:
> >       And the disputed point:
>
> >         - If the drive holding the WAL fails, then the database engine
> >           will shut down cleanly by writing everything in RAM out to
> >           the real database tables, and no data will be lost.
>
> Whoever claimed that has no familiarity with the code at all, and no
> understanding of the basic WAL rule: write to the log BEFORE you write
> data.
>
> In point of fact, loss of the WAL drive will mean a database PANIC stop
> and probably a corrupt data area afterwards, since there'd be no
> guarantee that related page updates had all made it to disk.

Also the WAL files might be recyled at each checkpoint, which is at
least every five minutes, so pg_xlog will not contain all the WAL files
from the backup, unless you are using point-in-time recovery --- this
might be where you got confused.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vlad
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql replication
Next
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Rpm packaging of 8.0.2 libraries