Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 20050504114704.Y53065@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> 
>>> As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
>>> time to replace it.
>>> 
>> 
>> CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
>> matter in hand.  What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
>> sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.
>> 
>> 
> I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were 
> driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-)

Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide 
"per directory user restrictions"?  Where I could give CVS access to 
Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory?

Serious question here, since I don't know, I only know CVS can't (or, 
rather, not that I've ever been able to find in the docs) ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement