Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK
> > with it. It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal
> > with the recursive dependency problem.
>
> Then what is the point of having it in CVS? Other then to make are tar
> ball bigger?
So it can be maintained with other PL languages as the internal API
changes. This is the same reason ecpg is in our CVS because it is tied
to the grammar.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
