Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 20050502153742.S53065@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK 
> with it.  It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal 
> with the recursive dependency problem.

Then what is the point of having it in CVS?  Other then to make are tar 
ball bigger?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email:            Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased