Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date
Msg-id 20050429124149.W53065@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Responses Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:09:43 -0400,
>  Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
>>>> In the last exciting episode, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
>>>>> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)
>>>
>>>> If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
>>>> time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.
>>>
>>> [ shrug... ]  You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it.
>>> I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1.
>>
>> Agreed.  It will just be there to turn on from postgresql.conf if you
>> want it, and we do have TODO information about keeping such an FSM for
>> recently expired pages.
>
> I think if we aren't finding problems in testing that it would be better
> to turn pg_autovacuum on by default. Vacuum is something the burns new
> users and having it one by default is going to cut down on surprises.

Except for the surprise of peridically having the system go unresponsive 
because it hit a large table, and that new user wondering what is wrong 
with postgresql that it just stalls seemingly randomly :(

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1