Mohan, Ross wrote:
> Clustered file systems is the first/best example that
> comes to mind. Host A and Host B can both request from diskfarm, eg.
So one host writes to part of the disk and another host writes to a
different part?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:10 PM
> To: Mohan, Ross
> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] How to improve db performance with $7K?
>
>
> Mohan, Ross wrote:
> > The only part I am pretty sure about is that real-world experience
> > shows SCSI is better for a mixed I/O environment. Not sure why,
> > exactly, but the command queueing obviously helps, and I am not sure
> > what else does.
> >
> > || TCQ is the secret sauce, no doubt. I think NCQ (the SATA version
> > || of per se drive request reordering)
> > should go a looong way (but not all the way) toward making SATA 'enterprise acceptable'. Multiple
> > initiators (e.g. more than one host being able to talk to a drive) is a biggie, too. AFAIK only SCSI
> > drives/controllers do that for now.
>
> What is 'multiple initiators' used for in the real world?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
