I've offered/asked in the past ... and would be more then happy to have
someone 'take responsibility' for moderating some of the lists if someone
has time ...
Its easy enough to add extra owners to a list to allow for others to
approve/reject ...
list volume wise, I'd say -general, -hackers, -bugs and -interfaces ...
-jdbc already has someone from the JDBC group monitoring ... Greg, want me
ot add you as moderator for the 4 above? Or start with just one (-bugs?)
and add over time?
Josh, you had mentioned adding you to -advocacy at one point?
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes:
>>> I try to do it more often, but *at least* on the weekend I make sure I get
>>> all the lists cleared out ...
>
>> Would it help if the work was more shared? I daily clean out a number of lists,
>> and could certainly add in some of the pg ones. If we had a few more people,
>> particularly in overlapping time zones (e.g. US, Russia, Australia), delays
>> would probably drop to a few hours...
>
> I'd really like to see something like that put in place. I'm feeling
> annoyed right now that pgsql-bugs doesn't have better propagation time
> for nonmember postings; the crashing bug I fixed today could have been
> fixed in 8.0.2 if the report had come in when it was sent ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
