Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> >> Thanks for the patch -- I applied a modified version (we can't use
> >> <ulink url="...">description</ulink> since that won't work for
> >> printed versions of the docs).
>
> > Sure it will. We use that all over the place.
>
> Not since Bruce took them all out a few days ago ;-). If you were
> unhappy with that you should have spoken up. I thought the problem
> was that the default printed representation doesn't show the URL
> and is thus pretty useless.
Right. I took them out specificially becuase Peter said it wouldn't
print the URL, just the description, and that was bad. I standardized
on <ulink url="..."></ulink> which prints just the URL, and worked the
description on to the existing sentence.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
