Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Buttafuoco
Subject Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures
Date
Msg-id 20050404133141.M7292@contactbda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures
List pgsql-hackers
Why doesn't the regression test set the timezone to GMT instead of PST.  I believe the horology test would just work
then.


Jim



---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:08:46 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm status: recent check failures 

> Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com> writes:
> > Just a quick heads-up: I'm not sure of the cause, but it looks like 
> > something recent change to HEAD and REL8_0_STABLE is causing check 
> > failures on the buildfarm machines. A brief (and thoroughly naive) 
> > glance at the details shows a horology test failure.
> 
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/regress-evaluation.html#AEN22575
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
------- End of Original Message -------



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: add_missing_from in 8.1
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL