Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Date
Msg-id 200503160000.j2G00PC09518@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql  (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>)
Responses Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql  (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>)
List pgsql-general
Mark Rae wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:46:50PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Mark Rae wrote:
> > > Also, while on the subject of scaling. I had the opportunity
> > > to try postgres on a 16CPU Altix and couldn't get it to scale
> > > more than about 4x, whereas Oracle got up to about 12x faster
> > >
> > We have had some major SMP improvements in current CVS.  Were you
> > testing that or 8.0.X?
>
> It tried it with 8.0.0rc3, and had previously tried a 7.4 version

Oh, you have to try CVS HEAD or a nightly snapshot.  Tom made a major
change that allows scaling in SMP environments.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Rae
Date:
Subject: Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython function problem workaround