Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 20050302211018.GB19492@osdl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes:
> > Ah, ok.  I've reapplied the 2Q patch to CVS from 20050301:
> >     http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/313/
> 
> > I ran it for 3 hours, just in case, and the charts suggest it flattens
> > out after 2 hours.
> 
> Thanks.  This seems odd though, since it appears to level out at
> something above 4K TPM.  Your previous run
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/311/
> shows it dropping to 3500 or so.  What changed?

Other than pulling from CVS at a different time, it should all be
the same parameters, etc.

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Next
From: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression