Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
Date
Msg-id 200503021331.j22DVBS14450@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode  (Markus Bertheau ☭ <twanger@bluetwanger.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
List pgsql-patches
Markus Bertheau ? wrote:
> ? ???, 26/02/2005 ? 15:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian ?????:
>
> > Other than that the other conversion files were already named fine, e.g.
> > ascii_to_utf_8 (no UNICODE), however it is utf_8 and not utf8.  I am
> > unsure how to handle these.
>
> General remark about the spelling of this encoding:
>
> The correct encoding name is "UTF-8".
>
> "The official name and spelling of this encoding is UTF-8, where UTF
> stands for UCS Transformation Format. Please do not write UTF-8 in any
> documentation text in other ways (such as utf8 or UTF_8), unless of
> course you refer to a variable name and not the encoding itself."
>
> from
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#utf-8

True, but Peter says the ANSI standard calls it UTF8 so that's what I
used.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: snprintf improvements