Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date
Msg-id 20050128153303.GC9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering  (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> Slony do not use RAM ... but PostgreSQL will need RAM for accessing a database
> of 50 Gb ... so having two servers with the same configuration replicated by
> slony do not slove the problem of the scalability of the database ...

You could use SSD for your storage.  That'd make it go rather quickly
even if it had to seek on disk.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
        --Roger Brinner

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering