Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
Date
Msg-id 20050123151337.GD4406@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> As the patch gets more attention, I'm sure more issues will come up.

I see the changes to the lock manager are huge.  Can you explain what's
the idea behind those?  Do you release the locks and then reacquire
them, or do you reassign them to a pseudo process?  Are there
possibilities of deadlock somewhere?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without
cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant
and productive. (7th Commandment for C Programmers)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Arnold.Zhu"
Date:
Subject: Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads