Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 20050117192744.GB12666@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ARC patent  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:14:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think it needs to delay the release; the patent is only pending.
> But we need to look into the problem.

What will you do if the patent is granted, 8.0 is out there with the
offending code, and you get a cease-and-desist letter from IBM
demanding the removal of all offending code from the Net?  The code
would have to be yanked from CVS &c., in that case, no?  (IANAL, but
I think I may consult with one.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.    --Philip Greenspun


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nicolai Tufar
Date:
Subject: Re: %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent