Re: pgdump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pgdump
Date
Msg-id 200501170442.j0H4gNW23506@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgdump  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: pgdump
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/pg_dump.c.diff
> 
> Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
> any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
> suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
> specified via the "-n" option?

I don't remember this patch.  How is it related to the other pg_dump
patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

> (Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
> the 8.0.0 final release?)

I guess we could do that now actually.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump