Re: pgdump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: pgdump
Date
Msg-id 1105937990.22946.17.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgdump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgdump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: pgdump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't remember this patch.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00331.php

> How is it related to the other pg_dump
> patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving
-t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated.

Something like the design elaborated here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00374.php

looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO.
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in
that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to
implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already
beaten me to it.

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump