Re: pg_class changes for group ownership - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
Date
Msg-id 20041229184156.GD10437@ns.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class changes for group ownership  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
List pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > Ah, alright, sounds good to me.  I'll look into making them share a
> > common unique identifier space, that shouldn't be too difficult.  Of
> > course, that'll require a dump/restore, I expect..  I don't suppose that
> > could possibly happen before 8.0, eh? :)
>
> Changing pg_class would have the same problem ...

Well, yes, but that's no longer the issue.  I guess my thought was that
if we could get the common id space change in before 8.0 then group
ownership could possibly be introduced in 8.1 w/o having to do a
dump/restore.  I'm still relatively new to Postgres, is it normal to
require a dump/restore between semi-major (8.0 to 8.1) revisions?  If so
then it doesn't matter since I wouldn't expect group ownership to be
introduced prior to 8.1 (at the earliest..) anyway.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class changes for group ownership