On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:09:10PM -0500, Keith Worthington wrote: > Exactly what I needed. Thank you. I didn't realize that a sequence > carried a set of permissions separate from that of the column/table to > which it was attached. Yep. Here's a thread I started a couple of months ago proposing that table permissions cascade to their implicit sequences: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-10/msg00511.php Tom Lane raised some implementation concerns: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-10/msg00554.php -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
pgsql-novice by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных