Re: Alternatives to Dell? - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Matthew Marlowe |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20041202013531.921D69A773@web.private.deploylinux.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Alternatives to Dell? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Alternatives to Dell?
Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
List | pgsql-performance |
Josh, Steve: I have also been looking at non-dell server vendors due to recent concerns about the PERC RAID Controllers. That said, I believe IBM just shoots itself in the foot via its sales/pricing practices.... Price out a PE2850 w/ 8GB RAM and 6 18GB Drives on the Dell website and you'll get a number in the $9-10K range. Talk to your sales rep and you can get a $1-2K discount(total $7-8K). That seems fair and it wins alot of business. Go the IBM website, try to find a comparative x86 system and spec it out. The list pricing is in the $12-16K range. Yes, I know I could get a good discount if I developed a relationship with an IBM reseller here..and perhaps the end pricing would be in the $10-12K range....but the Dell way just seems alot more honest to me, and reasonable. The IBM gear doesn't seem that much better. And while I have concerns about some of the Dell hardware, none of the issues have really caused any issues for me or my clients here yet.....(crossing fingers..) I just don't think IBM makes it easy for new customers to buy their equipment and if I went with them, I'd always have the lingering suspicion that I was paying too much. I really hope they change some day... Until then, I just see Dell winning more of the server market share. Regards, Matt --- Original Message--- To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org From: Steven Rosenstein <srosenst@us.ibm.com> Sent: 12/01/2004 4:17PM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Alternatives to Dell? >> >> >> >> >> I recommend IBM equipment, but in the spirit of caveat emptor I should let >> you know I work for IBM... :-) >> >> Seriously, I've been using IBM laptops and desktops for about 5 years, even >> before I started working for them. They tend to be a little more expensive >> than Dell, but I think they use beefier components and don't cut the specs >> quite as close as Dell does. IBM gear is designed more for industrial use >> than home computing, which is reflected in the quality (and the price). >> >> IBM just released a new series of PowerPC-based servers that are >> specifically designed to run Linux. They're at the higher end, but from >> what I understand, they provide much more bang for the buck than >> Intel-based servers. >> >> I hope this helps, >> --- Steve >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> ___________ >> >> Steven Rosenstein >> Senior IT Architect/Specialist | IBM Virtual Server Administration >> Voice/FAX: 845-689-2064 | Cell: 646-345-6978 | Tieline: 930-6001 >> Text Messaging: 6463456978 @ mobile.mycingular.com >> Email: srosenst @ us.ibm.com >> >> "Learn from the mistakes of others because you can't live long enough to >> make them all yourself." -- Eleanor Roosevelt >> >> >> >> Josh Berkus >> <josh@agliodbs.co >> m> To >> Sent by: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org >> pgsql-performance cc >> -owner@postgresql >> .org Subject >> [PERFORM] Alternatives to Dell? >> >> 12/01/2004 05:24 >> PM >> >> >> Please respond to >> josh >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> A lot of people have been having a devilish time with Dell hardware lately. >> >> It seems like the quality control just isn't there on the Dell servers. >> >> Thing is, some companies are required to use 1st-tier or at least 2nd-tier >> vendors for hardware; they won't home-build. For those people, what >> vendors >> do others on this list recommend? What have been your good/bad >> experiences? >> >> -- >> --Josh >> >> Josh Berkus >> Aglio Database Solutions >> San Francisco >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html >> >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >>
pgsql-performance by date: