Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date
Msg-id 200410290006.i9T06q507932@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Gavin,
> >
> > > So, I think we could have a really professional design for the
> > > postgresql.org site which greatly simplifies the current layout and still
> > > conveys all the useful information the current and beta home page has. I
> > > think the most important thing is if Omar and Emily can take their design
> > > and integrate it with the great work Alexey and others have already done.
> >
> > I'm not arguing against Omar & Emily's design.   Just timing -- I think that
> > the WWW team (read Alexey) should get the new site live with what we have
> > (Lucasz design) and address a re-design later.
>
> Sure. But I think its important, irrespective of current plans, to look to
> the future. Just like its acceptable to propose features for 8.1 during
> 8.0 feature freeze...

Yes, but if you are going to applaud a new design before the current one
is completed, you should make it clear you are planning on future
enhancements.  We do that clearly with patches already.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: perceived absence of work on website