Re: transaction idle timeout in 7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeroen T. Vermeulen
Subject Re: transaction idle timeout in 7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta2
Date
Msg-id 20040918201329.GB90239@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transaction idle timeout in 7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 04:05:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, I think it would time out quickly --- anyway on the order of
> minutes not hours.  By hypothesis, the situation you're worried about is
> where the backend was unable to send you a COMMIT acknowledgement
> message.  The kernel is going to realize that it didn't get an ACK back,
> and is going to retry a few times, and is then going to declare the
> connection lost.  The case where you may have a very long delay before
> detection of connection loss is where the backend is sitting idle with
> nothing to send.

That's one load off my mind, thanks.


Jeroen



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: transaction idle timeout in 7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta2
Next
From: David Wheeler
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0