Fwd: RE: Questions from PostgreSQL Advocacy team - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Fwd: RE: Questions from PostgreSQL Advocacy team
Date
Msg-id 200409081820.13759.shridhar@frodo.hserus.net
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-advocacy
Hi,

It looks like it will be quite some time before we can quote SkyPak. I will
keep following up..

 Shridhar
Hi Shridhar,

I have to co-ordinate with the programmer who is new to the entire project
which was been abandoned. It is taking some time to actually fine tune
things.

Meanwhile I am planning to setup another database in postgresql for our
sister concern by the end of this month.

Shall I go for 7.4 or stick to 7.3 ?

Regards
Suresh Chaudhary


-----Original Message-----
From: Shridhar Daithankar [mailto:shridhar@frodo.hserus.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:04 PM
To: ssc@skypakindia.com
Cc: Vishal Kashyap
Subject: Re: Questions from PostgreSQL Advocacy team


Hello Suresh,

I hope you have much better situation now with postgresql..:-) Please let us
know if you need any further assistance..

Me and Vishal were thinking of putting up a follow-up story of  SkyPak and
postgresql.  We were thinking that once you have a system that is working
fine in production, it could be good time to work on an advocacy article.

Can you tell us by what time you expect to reach a milestone in your
postgresql tuning efforts? That would help us to coordinate with
publications
etc.

Again, let us know if you need any help..

Regards,
 Shridhar

On Saturday 28 Aug 2004 4:01 pm, Suresh Chaudhary wrote:
> Shridhar
>
> I have already done the following in postgresql.conf
>
> log_duration = true
> log_statement = true
>
> alongwith this i had also added
>
> log_min_duration_statement = 2000
>
> but it does not work with the current version.
>
> Josh has given some suggestions let me try them out and see the
difference.


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: LinuxWorld, London Olympia Oct 6th/7th
Next
From: Robert Bernier
Date:
Subject: Re: was your posting --> news letter