Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Date
Msg-id 200408240818.10313.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> > If that's not worth the trouble, would it be a good idea to have
> > configure disable spinlocks automagically on unsupported platforms?
>
> It used to do that.  We deliberately changed this in 8.0 so that
> people would be aware that they were losing performance, and would be
> motivated to look into possible solutions.

Actually, the previous port report for 7.4 already required explicit 
disabling:
   needs new config.guess, --disable-spinlocks 

(We fixed that first point anyway.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900