Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Overall, I would *love* to have someone take a stab at a single, 4-5 line
> > "expanded corporate participation" paragraph that mentions most companies.
> > The press is really interested in knowing what companies back PostgreSQL.
> > Also, it helps drum into reporters that PostgreSQL is not a single-company
> > project.
>
> Agreed on justification, and about the "4-5 line para" ... just your
> outline seemed to have several 'paras' focusing on it :)
>
> Why not attribute the features themselves when you list them? Who
> sponsored what?
>
> Also, the PR should be focused around what we are releasing, not side
> projects ... Slony-I isn't part of this release, and, IMHO, isn't
> appropriate as part of the PostgreSQL Server press release ... they should
> be doing their own Press Release for that. Focus on what *we* are
> releasing, not what another project is releasing ...
But we need to share our visibility with relivant child projects.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
