Re: reply to setting - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: reply to setting
Date
Msg-id 20040811191321.GA14350@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to reply to setting  (Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>)
Responses Re: reply to setting  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:33:08 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com> wrote:
> hi,
> any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the 
> list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to 
> the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication

The duplication is needless. Direct replies very often get to the recipient
faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct
replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put
them in different folders).

Recipients that prefer not to get separate copies can indicate that desire
by including an appropiate mail-followup-to header.


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: David Garamond
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying two tables side by side
Next
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: sleep function