Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date
Msg-id 200408090957.33291.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
List pgsql-bugs
Tom,

> Why would it matter?  I don't think I've ever once had occasion to use
> the -L switch in initdb, because it figures it out just fine for itself.
> People who are using it should be wizardly enough to know about the
> chdir.

Oh.  Then I have a different bug to report, because INITDB for Sunday's CVS
would not run without the -L option.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?