Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date
Msg-id 200408090942.41481.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
Tom,

> It might be worth absolut-izing this path in initdb before it's
> passed down, but I can't get exceedingly excited about it.

Well, once again let me check the docs to make sure people are warned about
this ....

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?