Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation?
Date
Msg-id 200407180055.i6I0tc304054@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum Cost Documentation?  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
> functionality.  I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
> on it in the developer docs.  Is that right?
> 
> Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is:
> 
> #vacuum_cost_naptime = 50       # 0-1000 milliseconds
> 
> however psql reports this value as 0.  I assume this is just
> postgresql.conf is just wrong.  Can we fix this so it's consistent?

I am not really fond of the term 'naptime'.  Delay?  Sleep?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Vacuum Cost Documentation?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: NT + deadlock intended behaviour ?