Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Date
Msg-id 20040714155301.V21625@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> What are you talking about?  Are you suggesting Fujitsu's features are
> getting more attendtion than ARC for some political reason?  You think
> nested transactions and tablespaces are just press release features?
> All those features are being developed by the community under community
> direction and based on community feedback/needs.  How is that different
> from Afilias funding ARC?

No, the beef that Jan has, and that I also have, is that we put off the 
release that was schedualed for June 1st in order to get Nested Xacts into 
the tree ... hindsight being 20-20, we shouldn't have done that, but 
should have delayed Nested Xacts for 7.6 ... there *were* enough features 
in the tree to warrant a release, and features that ppl needed / wanted.

Do I believe there were political motivations for postponing the feature 
freeze?  Personally ... no.  And I don't believe that the Press Release 
(and a nice one at that) can really be counted as motivation for the 
postponement, since the PR was done *after* we decided to push things back 
a month ...

I do believe that there was some pressure from Futjitsu involved, in 
postponing it, since they'd rather see it in sooner then later ... *but* 
... I don't really believe that the pressure is any different then there 
quite possibly could have been had, say, Jan been "almost finished" ARC 
and Affilias wanted to see that sooner rather then later ... we all want 
to see the feature we've either been working on, or funded, released as 
soon as possible ...

The big problem that I see with how this feature freeze/beta/release has 
gone down is that we have *alot* of big items that are/were being worked 
on (ARC, BGWriter, auto_vacuum, PITR, Nested Xacts), and only so much man 
power at the reviewer stage ... we *should* have frozen it all on June 
1st, got the ready features out the door and released, and then 
concentrated on getting the "almost ready, but not quite" features into 
the next release as quickly as possible ...

Hindsight is 20-20 ... maybe next time we'll learn from it?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Release planning