Re: Release planning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan M. Gardner
Subject Re: Release planning
Date
Msg-id 200407131949.35725.jgardner@jonathangardner.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Release planning  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 13 July 2004 7:33 pm, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> PHP's the same.  Absolutely dreadful.  They put all sorts of new
> features mixed in with security and bug fixes in their minor releases.
> The NUMBER OF TIMES I've upgraded PHP to fix a bug and they've
> introduced a new global function that conflicts with one of my user one
> and worse...
>

I was arguing quite the opposite. New features wouldn't be introduced into
code that is in the stable community. Only bug fixes and security patches
would be introduced to the stable community, and very carefully.

- --
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner@jonathangardner.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9J89qp6r/MVGlwwRAh6CAKDCJhuomf8hWbHMHGqrYfCGi5QzxQCfT4Hs
feHVoYbFW0tq6BwJtFxy+EE=
=BmHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Is "trust" really a good default?