Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Date
Msg-id 200407131556.i6DFuJW02301@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Release planning (was: Re: Status report)  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 7/10/2004 11:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > If you get full control of PostgreSQL, you can dictate what will happen.
> > Until then, I will follow the community consensus, which may or may not
> > match your opinion.
> 
> Marc isn't the only one who didn't like waiting for more features going 
> into 7.5 two months ago. I agree that it is too late now to push things 
> just out. But the mistake made wasn't ours.
> 
> What this repeated discussion about release plans and schedules (and we 
> have it every release) indicates to me is that we might miss something. 
> As you pointed out elsewhere, a 9-12 month development cycle just isn't 
> enough to get those big features done. But I think that stretching the 
> release cycle to two years and holding back all the smaller features as 
> well isn't a good idea either.
> 
> I think in the future we have to force all large features, those that 
> probably need more than 6 months of development time, to be properly 
> #ifdef'd. Then it wouldn't be that big of a deal to release more often.

Alvaro started out with ifdef's but it got too confusing and we all
agreed to just go with a normal patch.  He just hits too much code. 
PITR could be done that way though.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All