On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Yes, we free some things. Granted it's not a lot, but we have stacks
> > for several things that will be always be growing with savepoints,
>
> They will not always be growing for savepoints, you can free things when
> using savepoints just as with subtransactions.
I still don't see when I can release a savepoint's state.
You showed a particular case, where we can finish a released savepoint
that is the innermost transaction. However, as soon as there is another
savepoint set after the released savepoint was set, we can't free the
second.
I mean this:
begin; ... work ...; savepoint foo; ... more work ...; savepoint bar; ... yet more ... ; release foo;
At this time I can't release savepoint foo because the implementation
(nested) requires me to keep it open as long as savepoint bar exists.
If I released bar at a later time, I could close both, but not before.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"¿Qué importan los años? Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo" (Mafalda)
