Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces
Date
Msg-id 20040528104846.T4131@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces  (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>)
Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> Is that core's decision that:
>>>>
>>>> o below all four major features will be incorporated into 7.5
>>>
>>> We don't know.  If they can be added to CVS without major changes, they
>>> will be in 7.5.  As far as I can tell:
>>>
>>>     Win32 has 98% of its code in CVS, so it will make it
>>>     Tablespaces - Christopher says it is ready, and has run tests
>>>     PITR - some functionality might be in 7.5, but we aren't sure
>>>     Nested transactions - Alvaro thinks it is close, but we don't know
>
> Today is May 28. So if nobody will not commit above within 3 days, non
> of them will be in 7.5(8.0). Am I correct?

Not necessarily ... there are several Win32 related features that still 
haven't been committed (that I've seen) that will push back the release, 
and hopefully give some time for the other ones to get in ...

Off the top of my head ... the Installer and Service Manager come to mind 
... and Tom's fsync changes ...

Right now, I'd say feature freeze is looking more like next Friday (June 
4th), and we're evaluate it then ... that should hopefully give the above 
time to flesh out and get into CVS ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bob.Henkel@hartfordlife.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: contrib/ compile warnings