Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers
Date
Msg-id 20040521023423.E5739@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Neil Conway wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Tom appears to be against, everyone else seems to be for ... should we try
> > it and see how it works out?
>
> Sure, although I personally think Andrew's suggestion of creating a
> separate (non-archived) list that includes the full diff is the best
> solution. That satisfies both of Tom's gripes: it is "bulky", yes, but
> those who are against "bulkiness" can just subscribe to the old list,
> and it won't bloat the size of the list archives.

Can you have two DEFAULT lines in loginfo/commitinfo?  Seems to defeat the
concept of "default" :0

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikola Milutinovic
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PgSQL 7.4.2 - NaN on Tru64 UNIX - CORRECTION!!!
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers