On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:42:56AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On 5-May-04, at 2:26 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Here it is :)
> >
> > Looks good for the most part. A few minor quibbles / suggestions:
> >
> > - Where an example uses double-quotes in a function body, we ought
> > to change the example to use dollar quoting -- but if no
> > doubled-quotes are used, I think it's better to just stick with
> > single quotes. You've needlessly converted a few function bodies
> > to use dollar quotes in violation of this principle -- please
> > revert them
>
> I disagree. I think swiching between single quote and $$ based on
> the content is just too confusing. I would just use $$ in all cases
> unless $$ appears in the function (which should be rare), in which
> case I would use $quote$ or something generic. I am also not a fan
> of using $something$ that varies based on the type of function.
You folks have commit privs, so please settle on something.
Here's $.01 worth:
It ought to be pretty clear in each example that the stuff between the
$'s can be varied.
Another $.01:
Examples are in distressingly short and cloudy supply across
PostgreSQL docs. This appears to reflect the Greek tradition of
inquiry, as opposed (in this case) to the Babylonian one Richard
Feynman advocated, cf. <http://www.jefallbright.net/node/view/2062>.
I am doing what I can to correct this deficiency, and encourage others
to join me in this effort.
OK, that's my $.02 :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
