Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 20040423193442.GA5329@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:05:40AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> This is all I'm saying ... its like when we packaged up our first eRServer
> ... I didn't require our clients to go out and download PostgreSQL to
> build it, I pulled in the few files from our build environment into the
> package so that it could be built independently ...

I am the last person in the world to cast aspersions on anyone's
packaging, but I'm not sure holding erserver up as a paradigm case of
easy compilation outside the main build tree is going to make your
argument easier here.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What can we learn from MySQL?
Next
From: Shachar Shemesh
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What can we learn from MySQL?