Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 20040423005745.K32445@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, I think the number of files needed to build modules is small and I
> think can be installed by default in a /build directory.  I am thinking
> that with a little script help, projects can build apps that look like
> like Makefiles used in our core project.

This is all I'm saying ... its like when we packaged up our first eRServer
... I didn't require our clients to go out and download PostgreSQL to
build it, I pulled in the few files from our build environment into the
package so that it could be built independently ...

Nice thing was, we were able to hit as many platforms as PostgreSQL did,
as building shared libraries and such was all there ready to go ...




----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: What can we learn from MySQL?