Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 20040422045615.GA8531@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:29:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I am thinking they could untar into a directory under pgsgl/ or have a
> way to point to a 'configure'-run source tree and pull values from
> there.
> 
> If you include pg_config.h, or use Makefile.global, you have almost
> everything you need to compile your own, including flags, configure
> checks, and the location of the installation directory.

That would work only if they compiled the source themselves, as opposed
to using a binary package (which is very common).  I'm not sure if
installing the postgresql-dev or postgresql-devel package would be
enough.

If not, maybe pg_config could provide all the necessary info ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Hi! I'm a .signature virus!
cp me into your .signature file to help me spread!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions