Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 20040422030811.GB6727@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:47:11PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Joe Conway wrote:

> > - dblink-type capability should someday make it into the backend, albeit
> >    in the form of something compliant to the SQL/MED spec. This is
> >    standard functionality in many of the RDBMSs that Postgres users
> >    migrate from, and it is needed by enterprise users.
> 
> dblink isn't an integrated replication solution, it is a standalone one
> ... to date, I have not seen one replication solution that solves all the
> issues, and unless someone comes up with the be all, end all replication
> solution, none of them should be considered 'part of the backend' ...

You are thinking of dbmirror, while Joe talks about dblink.  It's
orthogonal functionality ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Cuando miro a alguien, más me atrae cómo cambia que quién es" (J. Binoche)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: cannot drop active portal