On 18/04/2004 19:37 Markus Bertheau wrote:
> РЧÑв, 15.04.2004, в 13:15, Paul Thomas пиÑеÑ:
> > On 15/04/2004 11:25 Dan Field wrote:
>
> > Your "= NULL" tests are also not valid SQL (should be IS NULL).
>
> I think = NULL _is_ valid SQL, it just doesn't do what you think.
It's valid in an assignment
update foo set bar = null;
PostgreSQL can be coerced into accepting where foo = null with the
transform_null_equals run-time option but that doesn't make it legal SQL
IFAIK.
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+