Re: Basic subtransaction facility - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date
Msg-id 200404181751.i3IHpLh12770@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Basic subtransaction facility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
> > If you want.  When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> > code, so it shouldn't affect anything.  However I posted mainly so
> > people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> > could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.
>
> I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

OK, thanks.  Yea, I think we should get it in rather than waiting for
Alvaro to finish the whole project.  This way, we have something in that
can't drift.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: ssinger@navtechinc.com
Date:
Subject: contrib/dbmirror
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation