Re: Basic subtransaction facility - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date
Msg-id 19607.1082302145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Basic subtransaction facility  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Responses Re: Basic subtransaction facility  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Basic subtransaction facility  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
> If you want.  When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> code, so it shouldn't affect anything.  However I posted mainly so
> people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.

I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation
Next
From: ssinger@navtechinc.com
Date:
Subject: contrib/dbmirror